

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 Chevrolet Impala SS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html</link>
	<description>Roadfly tests and reviews the hottest new cars, trucks, and suvs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:44:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug King</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-15771</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">151262549#comment-15771</guid>
		<description>I recently bought a 06 SS, it has every thing
and I really like it. It has 27K and I am
a previous owner of three Corvetts, 66, 87,
&amp; 90.  This chevy is faster then the Vett&#039;s
in that era. I know it will not compare to
the new 425 hp. but for my purposes it is
the key for me.

Chevy did a good job with this one, naturally,
being from the old school, I would prefer RWD.
Anyway, It makes me feel young again, and
enjoy looking at it and cleaning, almost as
much as driving.

Thank you Chevrolet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought a 06 SS, it has every thing<br />
and I really like it. It has 27K and I am<br />
a previous owner of three Corvetts, 66, 87,<br />
&amp; 90.  This chevy is faster then the Vett&#8217;s<br />
in that era. I know it will not compare to<br />
the new 425 hp. but for my purposes it is<br />
the key for me.</p>
<p>Chevy did a good job with this one, naturally,<br />
being from the old school, I would prefer RWD.<br />
Anyway, It makes me feel young again, and<br />
enjoy looking at it and cleaning, almost as<br />
much as driving.</p>
<p>Thank you Chevrolet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil grubbs</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-15150</link>
		<dc:creator>phil grubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">151262549#comment-15150</guid>
		<description>Well, I pretty much agree with everything you said about the impala ss with the exception of one thing. Myself being the owner of a &#039;06 impala ss , i love the car but it is noted that you must use at least 92 octane for the car to run properly. When I first purchased the car I was upset that it seemed as if I wasn&#039;t getting the power that it should have been producing but when I added 93 octane to the tank I was all teeth. So in closing you CAN technically use 87 gas but if you bought an &quot;SS&quot; why would you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I pretty much agree with everything you said about the impala ss with the exception of one thing. Myself being the owner of a &#8216;06 impala ss , i love the car but it is noted that you must use at least 92 octane for the car to run properly. When I first purchased the car I was upset that it seemed as if I wasn&#8217;t getting the power that it should have been producing but when I added 93 octane to the tank I was all teeth. So in closing you CAN technically use 87 gas but if you bought an &#8220;SS&#8221; why would you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
