

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 Chevrolet Impala SS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html</link>
	<description>Roadfly tests and reviews the hottest new cars, trucks, and suvs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-31514</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://151262549#comment-31514</guid>
		<description>I just bought a 2006 Impala SS in Silverstone. I had a &#039;67 Impala SS when I was 18, and this one is head and shoulders above the &#039;67. I considered myself a RWD purist, but this SS has nearly converted me. I love everything but the braking, but that&#039;s an easy, if not inexpensive, fix. Flowmasters, K&amp;N air intake and better rotors/calipers and this thing is a monster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a 2006 Impala SS in Silverstone. I had a &#8217;67 Impala SS when I was 18, and this one is head and shoulders above the &#8217;67. I considered myself a RWD purist, but this SS has nearly converted me. I love everything but the braking, but that&#8217;s an easy, if not inexpensive, fix. Flowmasters, K&amp;N air intake and better rotors/calipers and this thing is a monster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mieczkowski</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-28749</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mieczkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://151262549#comment-28749</guid>
		<description>I agree with every thing you said. As soon as I bought my &#039;06 Chevy Impala SS I had resignator removed (located behind the catalytic). I also had the factory mufflers removed and had Flomaster 40s installed. Sounds awsome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with every thing you said. As soon as I bought my &#8217;06 Chevy Impala SS I had resignator removed (located behind the catalytic). I also had the factory mufflers removed and had Flomaster 40s installed. Sounds awsome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-16746</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 03:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://151262549#comment-16746</guid>
		<description>I have a black 2007 Impala SS with 212,827 miles on it!!!! It still rides like i got it right off of the lot. I cant get enough of this car. Excellent engineering on Chevrolet&#039;s part. I have owned a 1969 Chevy Chevelle SS and my impala seems like it will take my Chevelle on take off with no problem. If you dont have one, GET ONE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a black 2007 Impala SS with 212,827 miles on it!!!! It still rides like i got it right off of the lot. I cant get enough of this car. Excellent engineering on Chevrolet&#8217;s part. I have owned a 1969 Chevy Chevelle SS and my impala seems like it will take my Chevelle on take off with no problem. If you dont have one, GET ONE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-16342</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://151262549#comment-16342</guid>
		<description>The 2006 Chevrolet Impala SS will go down in history as one of the really great Chevrolet performance automobiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2006 Chevrolet Impala SS will go down in history as one of the really great Chevrolet performance automobiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Abernathy</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-16163</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Abernathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://151262549#comment-16163</guid>
		<description>To anyone thinking of getting an SS, go with the Impala. I&#039;m 18 years old now, was 16 when I was given the car, and I absolutely love it. The car has always been exactly what I needed it to be, fun. 

Always fast, I can almost always get off the line first. The sound of the engine revving, especially in front of a movie theater, will definitely get you some looks. Along with two 12&#039; subs hitting on a thousand, to say the least it will satisfy.

I love my SS, from the lights down to the tires, buy one and you&#039;ll for sure enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To anyone thinking of getting an SS, go with the Impala. I&#8217;m 18 years old now, was 16 when I was given the car, and I absolutely love it. The car has always been exactly what I needed it to be, fun. </p>
<p>Always fast, I can almost always get off the line first. The sound of the engine revving, especially in front of a movie theater, will definitely get you some looks. Along with two 12&#8242; subs hitting on a thousand, to say the least it will satisfy.</p>
<p>I love my SS, from the lights down to the tires, buy one and you&#8217;ll for sure enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug King</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-15771</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://151262549#comment-15771</guid>
		<description>I recently bought a 06 SS, it has every thing
and I really like it. It has 27K and I am
a previous owner of three Corvetts, 66, 87,
&amp; 90.  This chevy is faster then the Vett&#039;s
in that era. I know it will not compare to
the new 425 hp. but for my purposes it is
the key for me.

Chevy did a good job with this one, naturally,
being from the old school, I would prefer RWD.
Anyway, It makes me feel young again, and
enjoy looking at it and cleaning, almost as
much as driving.

Thank you Chevrolet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought a 06 SS, it has every thing<br />
and I really like it. It has 27K and I am<br />
a previous owner of three Corvetts, 66, 87,<br />
&amp; 90.  This chevy is faster then the Vett&#8217;s<br />
in that era. I know it will not compare to<br />
the new 425 hp. but for my purposes it is<br />
the key for me.</p>
<p>Chevy did a good job with this one, naturally,<br />
being from the old school, I would prefer RWD.<br />
Anyway, It makes me feel young again, and<br />
enjoy looking at it and cleaning, almost as<br />
much as driving.</p>
<p>Thank you Chevrolet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil grubbs</title>
		<link>http://www.roadfly.com/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-car-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-15150</link>
		<dc:creator>phil grubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://151262549#comment-15150</guid>
		<description>Well, I pretty much agree with everything you said about the impala ss with the exception of one thing. Myself being the owner of a &#039;06 impala ss , i love the car but it is noted that you must use at least 92 octane for the car to run properly. When I first purchased the car I was upset that it seemed as if I wasn&#039;t getting the power that it should have been producing but when I added 93 octane to the tank I was all teeth. So in closing you CAN technically use 87 gas but if you bought an &quot;SS&quot; why would you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I pretty much agree with everything you said about the impala ss with the exception of one thing. Myself being the owner of a &#8217;06 impala ss , i love the car but it is noted that you must use at least 92 octane for the car to run properly. When I first purchased the car I was upset that it seemed as if I wasn&#8217;t getting the power that it should have been producing but when I added 93 octane to the tank I was all teeth. So in closing you CAN technically use 87 gas but if you bought an &#8220;SS&#8221; why would you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

